Active Ingredient: Orlistat
The first section deals with the disbanded FDA-EPA MOU of 1979 and the fact that synthetic fluorides are ingested as drugs, and the second section presents additional information on anionic fluorine chemistry and the questions that must be asked of suppliers of industrial fluorides intended for human ingestion.
Moreover, the FDA officially published in 1996 that Food Drug and Cosmetic Act regulations do indeed apply for substances added to drinking water.. FDA has a proud heritage for decades in maintaining correctly that anionic fluorine is not to be regarded as a normal component of fresh drinking water.
What a waste of one's energy most coaches would let you. This is 23 grams of H 2 SiF 6 and 1.
Since the SDWA prohibits any Federal requirement, industrial fluorides injected into public water supplies as presently orchestrated violates this Congressional legislation.
Although all liability is accepted by cities, rather than by the Federal CDC, city managers routinely inject synthetic fluorides only under the auspices of State Health Departments and, in the case of California, State regulations passed which are not in keeping with the intent of the original Congressional SDWA Statute.
Sadly, DPH officials have routinely requested in turn, in writing, that all questions for proof of safety and effectiveness be directed to offices of the Federal CDC.
This is deceptive practice. Food Drug and Cosmetic Act.
The Food Drug and Cosmetic Act specifically requires that any chemical substance proposed to be used to prevent or treat disease in humans must submit a new drug application for FDA approval.
The FDA correctly ruled in 1963 that fluorides added intentionally into water to treat dental caries would be an uncontrolled use of a drug where dosage cannot be controlled see original Petition, and it is well accepted that blood fluoride levels coming from fluoride ingestion do not decrease caries and in fact can induce abnormal tooth fluorosis.
Topical fluoride in the form of toothpaste and fluoride dental gels that contain high concentrations of fluoride does not alter teeth enamel but merely briefly coats it with re-soluble calcium fluoride globules see original petition.
Neither the CDC nor the EPA assume liability or responsibility for fluoride injections into public water supplies.
A 1988 Federal Register article submitted previously states that EPA is terminating its water additive program in 1990 which it did.
In fact fluoridation materials—which meet the definition of drugs—are added to drinking water for the purpose of treating without either a prescription or dosage instructions, in violation of the Act.
This is deceptive drug practice.
This Federal regulation, considered a Federal law, should prevent most or all fluosilicic acid fluoridation chemicals, and fluoridated waters with these chemicals, from being approved as OTC drugs except with an NDA.
This is because HF is an active fluoride ingredient in fluosilicic acid preparations, typically present in fluosilicic supplied to water districts at 1.
The greater Los Angeles basin recently began in. San Diego just began in. Sacramento, the State Capital, began in.
San Diego had opposed the injections in two city elections. The FDA should be aware that there is a chief fluoridation engineer, a Federal employee, working at the CDC and identifying himself and that he provides information on synthetic fluoride injection techniques to water districts.
He apparently does not understand that any Federal requirement to treat U. The SDWA applies broadly and covers the intentional injection of chemicals such as sodium fluoride and fluosilicic acid into water It applies to added foods or other materials that do not sanitize water, regardless of whether the agents are considered legal or illegal.
We humbly request that the FDA take a public stand on this issue, that it ban injections of fluoride into drinking water, and that it buffer that ban by providing information on oral synthetic fluorides, still widely available by prescription Luride for those who insist on systemic blood fluoride treatment through ingestion.
Permanent chemicalization of general public water supplies with chlorines sanitizes water to be bacteria free. Additional treatment of water with fluoridation materials which purportedly prevent bacterial-induced caries is mischief initiated and individuals, educational institutions and chemical companies which are misinformed or who are defending profitable vested interests.
Federal regulations mentioned in this letter, with verbatim wording, will be provided upon request if necessary. The intent of this letter is to clarify how injections of toxic waste fluoridation materials into U.
It is anticipated that these deceptive practices will one day end. Personal thanks go to the honorable Dr.